Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Department of physics, School of chemical engineering and physical science, Lovely professional University phagwara P. O. Box: 144401, India.

2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Govt. College of Technology, Coimbatore, P. O. Box: 641013, India.

10.30501/jree.2024.416390.1688

Abstract

Recently, waste materials have garnered attention for their potential in providing clean and affordable energy through thermochemical conversion techniques. They play a significant role in transforming waste into eco-friendly energy, but the proper selection of materials is crucial for successful thermochemical conversion. The primary objective of this study is to assess combustion efficiency based on activation energy, utilizing TGA and DTG analysis. Rice husk (RH), low-density polyethylene (LDPE), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) waste materials were chosen for investigation. Experiments were conducted at temperatures ranging from 25 °C to 600 °C, with varying heating rates of 10, 20, 30, and 40 °C min-1. The apparent activation energy of the feedstocks was determined using five different iso-conversional model-free approaches, namely Kissinger Akahira Sunose (KAS), Friedman, Flynn Wall Ozawa (FWO), Starink, and Tang methods. The apparent activation energy for rice husk, LDPE, and PET fell within the range of 113-123 kJ mol-1, 101-101 kJ mol-1and105-117kJmol-1, respectively This research also contributes to establishing Comprehensive Pyrolysis Index (CPI) values to identify suitable sources for pyrolysis and gasification. According to CPI results, temperatures between 500 to 600 °C are optimal for pyrolysis, and an increase in heating rate enhances the output of pyrolysis products. A higher CPI index is favorable for achieving both a high calorific value and increased hydrocarbon contents.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. 1. Acquah, G. E., Via, B. K., Fasina, O.O., Adhikari S., Billor S., Eckhardt, L. G. (2017)."Chemometric Modeling of Thermogravimetric Data for the Compositional Analysis of Forest Biomass". PLoS ONE, Vol.12, No. 3 (2017), e0172999. (https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172999).
  2. 2. Agnihotri, N., Gupta, G. K., Mondal, M. K. (2022). "Thermo-Kinetic Analysis, Thermodynamic Parameters, and Comprehensive Pyrolysis Index of Melia Azedarach Sawdust as a Genesis of Bioenergy". Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, (2022), 1-18. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02524-y).
  3. 3. Akahira, T., Sunose, T. (1971). "Method of Determining Activation Deterioration Constant of Electrical Insulating Materials". Research Report, Chiba Institute of Technology, 16, 22–23. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2019.100359)
  4. 4. Cai, J. (2018). "Processing Thermogravimetric Analysis Data for Isoconversional Kinetic Analysis of Lignocellulosic Biomass Pyrolysis: Case Study of Corn Stalk". Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 82, 2705-2715. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.113)
  5. Chen, W., Escalante, J., Chen, W., Tabatabaei, M., Tuan, A. (2022). "Pyrolysis of Lignocellulosic, Algal, Plastic, and Other Biomass Wastes for Biofuel Production and Circular Bioeconomy". Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 169 (2022) 112914. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112914)
  6. Keattch, C. (1995). "Studies in the History and Development of Thermo-Gravimetry". Journal of Thermal Analysis, Vol. 44, No. 5 (1995), 1211-1218. (https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01905580).
  7. 7. Kumar, M., Sabharwal, S., Mishra, P. K., Upadhyay, S. N. (2019). "Thermal Degradation Kinetics of Sugarcane Leaves (Saccharum Officinarum L) Using Thermo-Gravimetric and Differential Scanning Calorimetric Studies". Bioresource Technology, Vol. 279 (2019) 262-270. (10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.137.
  8. 8. Kumar, M., Upadhyay, S. N., & Mishra, P. K. (2020). "Effect of Montmorillonite Clay on Pyrolysis of Paper Mill Waste". Bioresource Technology, Vol. 307(2020),123161. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123161).
  9. Nawaz, A., Kumar, P. (2022). "Pyrolysis Behavior of Low-Value Biomass (Sesbania Bispinosa) to Elucidate Its Bioenergy Potential: Kinetic, Thermodynamic, and Prediction Modeling Using Artificial Neural Network". Renewable Energy, Vol. 200 (2022) 257–270 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.09.110).
  10. 10. NPTEL. report . "Thermogravimetric Analysis", 2016, Retrieved from (https://nptel.ac.in/courses/115103030/21).
  11. 11. Olszak-Humienik, M., Mozejko, J. (2000). "Thermodynamic Functions of Activated Complexes Created in Thermal Decomposition Processes of Sulphates". Thermochimica Acta, Vol. 344, No.1-2 (2000), 73–77. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6031(99)00329-9).
  12. Ozawa, T. (1965). "A New Method of Analyzing Thermogravimetric Data". Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, 38 (1965) 1881–1886. (https://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.38.1881).
  13. Rahman, M. (2022). "Test and performance optimization of nozzle inclination angle and swirl combustor in a low-tar biomass gasifier: a biomass power generation system perspective", Carbon Resources Conversion. Vol. 5, No. 2 (2022), 139-149. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crcon.2022.01.002).
  14. 14. Rahman, M., Henriksen, U.B., Ahrenfeldt, J., Arnavat, M.P. (2020). "Design, construction and operation of a low-tar biomass (LTB) gasifier for power applications", Energy, 204(2020), 117944. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117944).
  15. Ruvolo-Filho, A., Curti, P. S. (2006). "Chemical Kinetic Model and Thermodynamic Compensation Effect of Alkaline Hydrolysis of Waste (Polyethylene Terephthalate) in Non-Aqueous Ethylene Glycol Solution", Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol.45(2006), 7985–7996. (https://doi.org/10.1021/ie060528y).
  16. Singh, R. K., Patil, T., Sawarkar, A. N. (2020). "Pyrolysis of Garlic Husk Biomass: Physicochemical Characterization Thermodynamic and Kinetic Analyses". Bioresource Technology Reports, 12 (2020) 100558. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2020.100558).
  17. Singh, R. K., Ruj, B., Evrendilek, F. (2016). "Time and Temperature Dependent Fuel Gas Generation from Pyrolysis of Real World Municipal Plastic Waste", Fuel, 174 (2016) 164–171. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.01.049).
  18. 18. Vyazovkin, S., Burnham, A. K., Favergeon, L., Koga, N., Moukhina, E., P´erez-Maqueda, L. A., Sbirrazzuoli, N. (2020). ICTAC "Kinetics Committee Recommendations for Analysis of Multi-StepKinetics". Thermochimica Acta, Vol.689, 178597. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2020.178597).
  19. Vyazovkin, S., Wight, C.A. (1998). "Isothermal and non-isothermal kinetics of thermally stimulated reactions of solids", International Reviews in Physical Chemistry, Vol. 17, No.3 (1998) 407-433. ( https://doi.org/10.1080/014423598230108).
  20. Yang H., Yan R., Chen H., Lee D.H., Zheng C. (2007). "Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin pyrolysis" Vol. 86, No. 12–13( 2007), 1781-1788. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013).
  21. Zhang, J., Liu, J., Evrendilek, F., Zhang, X., Buyukada, M. (2019). "TG-FTIR and Py-GC/MS Analyses of Pyrolysis Behaviors and Products of Cattle Manure in CO2 and N2 Atmospheres: Kinetic, Thermodynamic, and Machine-Learning Models". Energy Conversion and Management, 195 (2019) 346–359. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.05.019).
  22. Zhang, L., Xu, C., Champagne, P. (2010). "Overview of Recent Advances in Thermo-Chemical Conversion of Biomass". Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 51, No.5, (2010), 969-982. (https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2009.11.038).